PS2 Original vs. PS2 Slim Disc Tray Clearly, for Sony to thin out the fat PS2 by such a drastic margin, there must have been significant changes made. And there were.
The 360 dominated more of the generation than the PS3 did, even though in the end I'm pretty sure the PS3 ended up selling more. The 360 was in the lead for basically the whole generation until the last few years when the PS3 started getting actual games and the Xbox brand was in the toilet. And a lot more people grew up playing on Xbox live in
The styling of the Sony PS3 Slim is a 100 per cent improvement on the original PS3. The original console may have been powerful, but it was also big and bloated, and looked out of place when sat alongside the latest slimline HD TVs. The slim Playstation 3 features a much thinner chassis, and also gets a smarter matt black finish.
Play (Idle) 200.9 W. 95.4 W. Play (full load) 205.9 W. 100.1 W. Power consumption of PS3 and PS3 Slim in different operation modes. If we look power consumption of competitive consoles of PS3, we can notice that Xbox 360 uses 187 watts during the game mode, while the Nintendo Wii consumes only 40 watts in the normal mode.
To cut it short, the PS3 slim is an improvised version of the original PS3. PS3 Vs. PS3 Slim. The most prominent difference between the two is their design. While the PS3 is a bit bulky in appearance, the slim is sleek and compact. As far as size and weight are concerned, the slim console is 32 percent smaller and 36 percent lighter than the
It is also the occasion to announce that if the PS3 Slim consumes less energy – 34% of the economy according to Sony – it remains nonetheless greedy compared to a Blu-ray player. So let’s take a closer look at power features: 1. Power Consumption of the Original PS3. You can recognize the first-generation PS3 by its thick, curved housing
uUQB. 440 377 253 388 286 345 251 105 239
is the ps3 slim better than the original
